3 SDG Target Mapping
Draft abstract: this chapter closes Part I by mapping technical capability clusters from Chapter 2 onto specific SDG indicators, and by returning to the institutional comparison opened in Section 1.4.
SDG alignment taxonomy · indicator mapping · knowledge-policy nexus · data provenance
3.1 Alignment Taxonomy
- Mapping technical capabilities to specific SDG indicators (e.g., Target 9.4, 12.4) rather than headline SDG numbers alone.
3.2 Identifying Negative Externalities and Trade-offs
- Where “AI for good” claims and material/energy costs diverge.
3.3 Comparative Knowledge Mapping: UNU, OECD, ADB
- Extends Section 1.4 into a knowledge-to-policy comparison across the three institutions.
- Framed as fostering open, collaborative innovation across multilateral agencies, not a ranking exercise.
3.4 3.4 Data Governance and Provenance for SDG Claims
- Minimum provenance metadata required before a claim can be cited in downstream chapters (DPP in Chapter 7; RegTech in Chapter 10).
TipBridge to Part II
Part II turns this evidence base into the design layer: the extended ITU canvases.